Record of 350-0-2 seems hard to get wrong

That's one thing that I find amazing (no, not just the 350-0-2, wherein the 0 may not be correct), but that the book has it as 100-2 wins/losses where it seems legendary in family lore and on internet searches, that there were 350 wins.

Carly did post a PDF of her research footnotes, etc. and I haven't poured over it, merely skimmed it.

Her records may be impeccable, but in light of these other errors, I have to think that she might have put a qualifier on her version of 100-2.